Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ALI versus MUHAMMAD SADDIQUE

Sections 53A, 54 and 58 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. IX, R 13 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Declaration of Plaintiffs' Declaration and Termination, Whether Mortgage or Sale, Plaintiff's Commitment Ex. In their claim of canceling and canceling the party decree, it was claimed that the defendant held the suit as a mortgage and the defendant obtained the ex parte decree in connection with the litigation with the processor server. Done, that was the document. It was a mortgage in question, but when it was wrongly banned as a contract to resist the defendant through a sale agreement, it was claimed that the sale agreement resulted in a suit land. Was transferred to, and it was in the possession of the owner that the defendant further claimed that the order was issued under the challenge The court refused to accept the service of the defendants and obtained a former party against them. After pleading guilty to fraud and fraud charges. The injunction in this case was unfounded; the trial court and the appellate court ruled in favor of both the plaintiffs as well as the defendants, the defendants against the decisions and orders of the two courts under legal judgment. The second appeal was filed, the defendants were ordered to prove that the question was not a sale contract, but a mortgage, but they could not produce the evidence that the petitioner and other witnesses clearly showed. There was a sale agreement in the documents and the surrounding conditions did not show any different intention of the parties. Or was This advocate for immigration from Naudero lawyer