Find a Lawyer

MIR ZAMAN versus STATE

Sections 302 and 34 of the decision to deny the Shariah Court bail against the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Islamic Constitutional Law Enforcement Act (IX of 1974), Section 15 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), sections 42 and 42B Was directed against the appeals against. The order of the Shariah court under which the appeals / revisions filed by the appellants was dismissed, a case related to a case, was found to be particularly helpful in criminal cases, especially in the case of bail, in other cases. The prosecution testifies to your particular circumstances. In view of the Complainant's and Ballistic Expert's statement about the eviction of the crime, it cannot be said that they could not be dressed as an offender if it was considered that the accused were present on the spot. But if his presence was not correct, the strange hours of the night with deadly weapons were accepted, it cannot be said that they were not the earliest aspect, at the appeal stage, compliance with the commission of the murder of the court adjourned. Responsible, could not be deeply appreciated. Evidence and the mother of the witnesses of the accused and the prosecution, among other matters, to find out if there is a material contradiction or a waiver, and if so, whether it is the same as in the case of litigation. In view of the statements made by the complainant, it cannot be said that the use of discretion by the courts in denying the bail of the accused was a violation of the law. property advocate from Machh lawyer