A. XXIII, R1 Fresh Suit Bar Withdrawal shall be restricted only to the fresh suit which was filed after the withdrawal of the first suit and not one which was filed and the first suit filed by the claimant was subsequently withdrawn. When the second case was already set up, the suit was not established after the first suit was withdrawn, so as to attract the provisions of sub-rule (3) of R1 of CPC AXXIII and the first and second A comparative study of the case revealed that the plaintiff sought a permanent injunction to prevent interference in the land, especially the measles number in the dispute, and to that extent I was ulat records can be optimized, and then in this case it was required to get the other khsra number. The plaintiff had not been searched before, after which the case also called for the declaration that he was the owner of three measles numbers on the basis of a sale that was executed in favor of his father, while before that. Before the relief was not claimed in the case, there were only three people in the case, while then the case was against many other people, besides the revenue officers also improved because of the revenue. Such relief was not sought because of record improvement. In addition, even if different, the times contained in sub-rule (3) of R1 of AXXIII, CPC shall not apply if the parties' identities and reasons for proceedings are not the same, provisions of O. XXCII, Rule 1 subsection (3) of CPC will not draw
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
