AMMARIS MEHTAB CHAUDHRY versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, SARGODHA UNIVERSITY
Article 199 Constitution Petition The cancellation of the unanimous admission of the educational institution, forced the applicants to cancel their enrollment at the university after they started attending the class and paid the fee, which caused the university to apply. Entries for were canceled. The Merit Accuracy Committee, which was set up to review the admissions process, did not call on applicants to inquire if they were involved in any wrongdoing in the admissions lawsuit against the applicants. The idea is that since the chairman of the admissions committee acted contrary to the rules, the applicants would have been involved in getting admission illegally, once a student gets admission, in favor of it. The right of a jurisdiction was created, which can only be canceled by adhering to the rules of the law. . In order to impose fines and penalties, U-type officials had to follow due process, which included investigations, show cause notices, hearings and a decision by a competent authority. The applicant's admission can only be canceled. When they are found guilty of pressing facts or if it proves that they have gained admission. Illegally, however, in the present case, the chairman of the admissions committee acted negligently and against the policy, but the applicants could not be held responsible for their actions on the part of the university as a mistake or neglect of the students. Cannot be held liable. It may show that the applicants contradicted the admission policy against Universe
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
