Sections 144 and 151 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877) Section 39 Cancellation of the Decree The restraining order for the sale of the property was filed in favor of the plaintiff and thereafter The appeal was appealed to the defendant, and the defendant was allowed to apply under section 144, CPC. And the possession was restored to the defendant should not harm the rights of any person of the court and Section 144 of the CPC was based on the principle that the plaintiff lost possession of the disputed property in compliance with the former party decree. Which was set aside by the High Court. On appeal, therefore, the defendants were entitled to restore their possession according to the law and to restore the parties to the same position which they had before the decree, which was a benefit to any of the plaintiffs under a decree. The party has the right to repatriate through Section 144 of the Rehabilitation, regardless of whether the CPC was enforceable regardless of the order of the Appellate Court of Rehabilitation or the order for the restoration to be secured. There was relief due to overturning. The administration of justice therefore did not have anything illegal in the disappearance order, in which case, revision was rejected \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
