NADIR KHAN versus SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPE LINES LTD., FAISALABAD
Son (applicant) accused of tampering with gas meter to reduce / avoid gas bills for lawsuit and permanent injunction for Articles 54 & 54 54 Claims to have a gas connection and filed a lawsuit for a permanent injunction. (User) and was submitting the bill and had never taken any defect, and the gas company (respondent) intended to disconnect the gas connection on the basis of the alleged tampering with the meter. The son's case was dismissed and the appellate court on appeal directed him to collect the dispute amount from the son without hearing the amount of the dispute and before finding out the fact that the meter was tampered with. He was entitled to take notice of the matter as a matter of fact, and that part of the disputed amount had been deposited by the trial court's order. Atraf was that he was not a user, but her father, the gas company. That he had no authority over his father to use a gas connection, and that at the time of filing the lawsuit, the son was not an advocate on behalf of his father (the user) allegedly against the father (the user) in the dispute That is, whether the case was filed by the son without the father's consent, the appellate court had not yet decided, which directed the son to submit the disputed money in court, the High Court directed. That if the appeal is filed by the son, the deposit will be returned to him, according to the law passed by the appellate court. According to him, review
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
