Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus STATE

Section 2?2 (b) / ????? 34 Testimonies of evidence were filed after consideration and consultation with the FIR against the former hostility between the parties could not be proved against the accused. No empty secret was found by chance. The other accused in the FIR were not confirmed. Eye evidence was not corroborated by medical evidence, the presence of four eyewitnesses at the time of the incident was not natural, the state's lawyer did not defend the unwanted verdict, the accused was acquitted on the benefit of the doubt. Conditions tax advocates from Daulat Pur lawyer