Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH COLLECTOR RAJANPUR versus MUHAMMAD ZAMIR KHAN

Sections 4, 6, 10, 17, 18, 23 and 54 Land Acquisition Assessment Land acquisition collector allowed landlords to pay Rs 550 per diem, not satisfied with land acquisition collector's award, landlords Filed an application under section 18 of the land. The Acquisition Act, 1894, increased the value of land obtained by the referee court to Rs 550 instead of 5 marla for raising the compensation amount as the land acquisition collector authorities filed an appeal against the decision of the referee court. Was acquired by the Land Acquisition Collector, who inspected the site, and found that the acquired land is located near factories, other populations and the owners of the land sold in connection with the adjoining land. Which was regularly reviewed by landowners. The collector, but nevertheless, he charged at a low rate of Rs 550 on each marla proof Ultimate proved that the land lying on the National Highway was built a college college 400/500 yards away from the said land. , Plus a microwave station and ginning and oil factories were built and there were residential colonies in front of the Degree College. And there was a hotel near the aforementioned land. Landlords also claimed that the value of the land was about Rs 6,000 / 7,000, which is located two kilometers away from the main road. The documentary evidence presented by the landlord strongly supported the sale of the surrounding land. Marla and the referee court correctly relied on a rate of 6,000 or more per documentary evidence based on evidence on the support record made by the referee court. us immigration advocates from Tando Jam lawyer