Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KARAMAT SUBHANI NAQSHBANDI versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER

Evidence of the Gift Oral Gift Execution The plaintiff claimed that his father had transferred the suit land to him in favor of the affidavit due to love and affection and the possession of the suit land was also handed over to him by the plaintiff. It was also prayed that the defendants were claimed to be barred from suing the land. The trial court and the appellate court dismissed the case simultaneously for not interfering with their possession in any way and in any way, the plaintiff filed a second appeal for two courts as well as judicial decisions and adjudication. That the evidence presented by the plaintiff to both witnesses, allegedly the oral gift presented by her father in her favor, was merely that the plaintiff's father once confessed in his presence that the gift To the plaintiff, but none of them said a word about the witness father's gift offer. As to the fact of the plaintiff's grant of the possession of the land under his acceptance or gift by the plaintiff, both the witnesses stated that the statement of self-service as a witness to the plaintiff's silence was absolutely silent, without He did not have enough freelance support to make him an alleged gift owner. Made orally, but it requires solid and solid evidence that the plaintiff's beneficiary suffered a deficiency in the gift case, proving all the terms of a Muslim gift as a gift. The father / alleged donor had to prove that the defendant was presented as a defendant. And the defendant made a written statement denying the gift in favor of the plaintiff best advocate from Mithi lawyer