Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

HAJI NOOR-UL-ISLAM versus STATE


Section 221, 265C and 265D Control of the Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (C) and 15 Charges made by applicants / accused, in review, for non-submission of required copies of documents. The question was asked in the charge sheet. The trial court held that the required copies of the documents required under Section 65CC, CCPC, were not provided to the accused and that the same should have been compiled in the presence of the lawyer for the applicant / accused's record. Copies were provided to the applicant on 14 12. During 2002, when the charge sheet was compiled on 26 3 2004, no petition was moved by the applicant before the trial court stating that it did not provide the required copies. The RPC did not provide this charge against the accused. Only to be framed in the presence of the lawyer of the accused and filed to prosecute in this case, he was dismissed

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
family advocate from Pasroor lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.