ABDUL RAZZAQ versus D.C.O., AND OTHERS
Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Appointment Applicants were employed as teachers in the respective schools under the contract while the applicant's contract work was still in progress, when the Education Department moved Had advertised in some other positions in schools. The contract-based ad contains a stipulation that the teachers were already on the contract; the officials did not agree that if the applicants were ready to resign, they could be considered in the following positions. And it was also filed by him. Authority that a person in the contract could not be allowed to resume employment at his convenience if the applicants had a sincere intention to improve their status and status by competing for a higher position, not in the bar included in the advertisement Should have come Way, but just because they would be so close to finding new jobs at their residences, they should be allowed to compete and if they succeed they would have to resign from their previous job. That was not valid Syed Scenario will definitely cause a problem, as the previous posts will be empty which will have to start a new recruitment process. The case was not well suited to the constitutional discretion. If applicants resign from their jobs within a week, and wish to participate, there will be no restriction on their matters.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Hattar lawyer