Find a Lawyer

STATE versus NAZIR AHMAD

The two accused also suffered fireworks wounds against the principles of Section 171717 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Rules 302, 307, 382, 148 and 149, the trial court correctly found. It was held that the unlawful occupant also had the right to take permanent possession of the land. If there was an illegal act to evict him, he would defend his possession against the real owner. All the prosecution's witnesses were interstate and the prosecution's witnesses confessed that they were not residents of the area where the alleged incident took place. Do not record the statements of any of the residents of the area, although they were said to be surrounded by the scene of the incident, although a prosecution witness was not related to the complaining party, but he lived 10 miles from that location. ? The witness testified on the occasion of the incident and failed to provide any plausible explanation of his presence on the occasion of the injection, there was no suspicion and confession of events, time and place. Was made, but they were all interesting witnesses and their statements could not be accepted as a truthful version of the gospel truth that the complaining party was an aggressor. In these circumstances, it cannot be said that any material evidence on the record is the result of wrong writing or non-recitation which Due to any abortion of justice, the accused cannot be punished or punished. Because he was involved in a heinous crime and was arrested by three persons belonging to the complaining party. when you need a advocate from Wana lawyer