Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RIAZ versus STATE

Section 242424 Definition of Evidence No one was named in the FIR One suspect was identified during the identification parade, and the other prosecutor's witness identified the other two suspects, because the complainant's case was full of contradictions He claimed that he had identified the three suspects, which was wrong because the complainant identified only one of the accused, according to the magistrate's action, before the trial. The court did not complain about the person who fired at him, during the investigation any suspects Was not recovered, police officer, who had investigated the case and had recorded the statement of a complaint, the dark was not presented during the trial. , It was hardly possible for the participant to identify the actual culprit The matter could not be denied to identify the false implications of the accused, when the complainant, who was the star witness of the case, came up with a contradictory version. Was, the prosecution failed to prove his case against the suspects beyond doubt, they were tried and convicted by the trial court, and the accused was acquitted famous lower court advocate from Kalar Syedian lawyer