MUNIR AHMED versus STATE
Complaint grants were filed by the accused in the section 497 Preventive code (XLV of 1860), sections 324, 337a (ii), 380, 411 and 452 bail, in which the cross version / counter version was registered, the accused. Were also injured. The alleged incident, which was investigated by the police themselves and the injuries reported by the informant, did not appear in the Prohibited Clause of Section 497, once approved, PC Bell was found to be wrong. Had to be canceled on some reasonable grounds such as use. No such allegation has been made by the prosecutor on the bail or threatening witnesses' testimony or the length of the trial, etc., the accused was not granted bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Sihala lawyer
