Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ versus CHANCELLOR, GOVERNMENT COLLEGE UNIVERSITY, FAISALABAD

Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Request Audi ultimatum Partum Principle Applying Principle The Chancellor's Pleasure / Scope Petitioner was appointed as Registrar in the University, for a period of three years subject to the approval of the terms and conditions. Three days later, the applicant's appointment, notification was issued under which he was removed from the job on the basis that he was to assume the position of Chancellor Plea, who was picked up by the applicant. Chancellor's statement was condemned by the Chancellor's consent. The notification did not receive the support of contemporary law but the contrary was against the provisions of section 14 of the Government College University, Faisalabad Ordinance 2002, which imposed certain procedures on the appointment of the Registrar and the criteria mentioned therein. Appointment was made in compliance. The Chancellor was to be made, yet it should be followed in accordance with the Government's recommendations which the Committee had appointed through the Syndicate and headed by the Vice-Chancellor, and it was not appointed at the sole discretion of the Chancellor. Was to appear in the notification - according to the Chancellor's pleas. Outstanding, excessive and useless is the law and the profits of the law, which is an administrative / executive order / instrument declared by the superior courts about a person's proposed action or opportunity to disclose. Lose the right to take notice. To be given, not only was it non-Islamic but the provision for eliminating the applicant's illegal notification was not considered. It gave the impression reasonably well best law firms from Orakzai lawyer