Find a Lawyer

MST. ZEENAT BIBI versus STATE

In Section 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), the constitutional petition for withdrawal of Article 199 FIR petitioner petitioned to abolish the FIR filed against him claiming that the applicant is a sui jury and He married his free will and claims he was not kidnapped by anyone. Applicants said she had entered into a marriage contract with another applicant, for which she was legally eligible to be a puberty girl. The complainant said that the girl was only 12 years and 7 months, was not legally authorized to execute the marriage with the boy. The complainant stated that the girl complainant also emphasized that the FIR Is properly listed and cannot be removed under constitutional jurisdiction (girl and boy) also claimed that a Baloch woman is authorized. In order to enter into a reasonable marriage agreement and it will be considered that Sui Georges girl's marriage petitioner filed a further case, it is pointed out that Islamic law has recognized the fact that the girl of adolescence, 12 years and 7 At the age of months, I had a valid marriage contract. The complainant submitted that under the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979, the age of 16 was minimum, according to well-known books on the subject, puberty would begin with menstruation in order to gain the majority's validity. , While justifying the marriage, observed that the applicant could not be considered as the perpetrator of the offense under section 11 of adultery. Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979, Permitting Constitutional Appeal, Section 11 (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 19 family advocate from Gujar Khan lawyer