The charges against the accused in connection with the section 497 (2) Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), tampering with the auxiliary or distribution pipelines of Articles 462C and 462F, and the grant of further investigation were unlawfully investigated. That he supported. The co-accused interrupted the central distribution gas pipeline and not only committed theft of gas for their use but also made the connection to more than 200 users / homes while some cases were broken by the complainant. Or were stopped while reporting crime, police co-accused were not searched by the police The co-accused persons were not residents of the area where the accused resided, despite the large scale of the allegedly illegal gas connections. The network was detected, but no name was encountered. In connection with the illegal consumers of the connection, who had shown seriousness and dishonesty on his behalf, the investigating officer was not seized outside the house of the accused, the investigating officer made any demand from the gas company to issue such demand notice The gas connection fee was not submitted by him to confirm the accused's claim. The record remains silent as to how much the gas company suffered due to the alleged crime The present case was a classic case of disqualification, dishonesty and dishonesty investigated by the officer under section 173, CRPC Had already been submitted. The court and the accused no longer needed further investigation. The case demanded further investigation into the accused's guilt, which accordingly was admitted on bail.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
