REHMAT ELLAHI versus PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY DEFENCE RAWALPINDI/ISLAMABAD
Section 18 Land Compensation, Appellant's determination did not challenge the decision appealed by the referee court before the High Court, and of the entire landowners, only one party filed an appeal before the High Court which was accepted. And the case was referred to the referee court, which increased its land compensation amount, which was a decision passed by the High Court, as well as a decision between the referee landlord who challenged the referee's decision. And the Land Acquisition Collector decided. It was a personal decision and not a decision in the RAM. The appellant could claim the benefit of a decision. In RAM, there was a similar decision but the decision rendered by the High Court was a personal decision and attracted to the case of the appellant himself. Had not happened He conceded that he did not control the decision made by the referee court regarding his reference and that the said decision was final, therefore, because of the decision made by the High Court in the case of another landlord. Are not entitled to benefit from it
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
