Find a Lawyer

HAJI MEERA JAN versus STATE

Sections 156 (1) (8), 181 and 196 Appeal to seize smuggled goods from the High Court An anti-smuggling staff stopped a truck and also included a truck made for bicycles made of foreign-made carpets and free wheels. The driver submitted a photocopy. A bill to show the import of the carpet, but no document was presented in relation to other items in which the Adler Collector (judiciary) found that the allegations of smuggling had been established; An injunction was ordered in favor of the owners. On payment of Rs 500,000 he was also given the option of redemption and the owner also had to pay personal penalty of Rs 200,000. By invalid order, the results recorded by the collector were retained, but on the owner. The order to impose personal penalties was strictly sent and sent to the appellant / owners goods. The Tribunal was not able to challenge any of the aggressive authority of the Adjusting Authority, as well as the impugned order. Failed to present any proof of valid and importable goods, the appellant was not open to immunity from the two forms presented to the owner, a fine of Rs 500,000 was exempt on the goods, accepted. Was reduced to Rs 150,000 ask a advocate free from FR Bannu / Lakki lawyer