Find a Lawyer

MRS. KOKAB JAVED versus ABDUL AHAD KHAN

A. XXXVII, Appeals for leave to defend 1 and 2 suit cases for collection of checks based on the amount allowed by the trial court to defend the case subject to the bank guarantee presented by the suit amount in the application. The case, of course, was a woman and a widow, and it is admitted that both the defendant and the plaintiff were working in the same organization, where the plaintiff was told that he was employed as his senior and his position was very high. Is. Consideration was given, and no specific details were given as to when, where, and in what manner such details were considered in response to respondent's respondent. It was not disclosed that the plaintiff's record has disclosed that matters, if any, will not be the result of mutual business relations as both parties were employees and they did not do any business. As a primary economic activity, under this case, fifteen checks were spread over a period of three years and the plaintiff took no action despite the fact that, despite the infidelity, and the plaintiff's allegation in context. The defense case reads did not encourage much confidence, so the bank's offer to guarantee that it protected the interests of the plaintiff. The bank guarantee through the trial was not sufficiently available in law for the extreme condition of the supply; in the circumstances, the most ridiculous conditions were known and the prominent features inevitably led to the interference in which the ineligible order The High Court set aside the order under which the defendant was ordered to present a bank guarantee. list of supreme court advocates from Hattian lawyer