Find a Lawyer

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX/WEALTH TAX COMPANIES ZONE, FAISALABAD versus MESSRS TAJ FLOUR MILLS (PVT.) LTD.

Sections 62 and 136 refer to the High Court Assessment, which assesses interest payments against private parties borrowed from a private company, obtained two types of loans from one bank and the other from private individuals and all said loans. Interest paid on , The loss of interest for the relevant assessment year and the assessment officer's interest in the assessment loan was acknowledged by the skyscraper on the loan received by the assessee, but paid by the assessee to the private parties. Interest was not allowed and it was stated that the interest amount increased by the Assessing Officer before the approval of the Commissioner Income Tax, which is the appellate authority for similar reasons, however. He was previously weighed in with the Assigning Officer Tribunal, though interest in the loan extension loan was extended. It was not allowed. In the present case, the cost assessing officer did not bt bt the cost of the debt of the Assisi for the purpose of doing business at the relevant time means that later on a business / manufacturing unit will be disbursed by the Assisi. Leased by a third party, there will be no denying interest claims that were previously appropriate during this period, as deductions by the Revenue Officer, and other questions raised by the Unit Operating Department Revenue. Has not been appealed by the Tribunal as stated in the discrimination notice. That neither the question was raised before the Tribunal nor the Tribunal High Court refused to answer the second question. top advocates from Hub Chowki lawyer