Find a Lawyer

ANJUM SOHAIL BHATTI versus STATE

Section 2 evidence2 The complainant who appreciated the evidence was the widow of the deceased and also the prisoner of the house residing in the house, who furnished all the details of the incident in the FIR and the complainant presented the witness's case and There was no enmity with the accused's day of events. At the time and the suspect knew it, there was no possibility of any wrongdoing about the identity of the accused. The complainant had no credible evidence against the accused, reliable evidence even the evidence was a witness. , The evidence of which can be trusted and proved to be true, was sufficient to establish the basis of the accused's conviction. The medical evidence provided full support for the ocular testimony. The doctor had nothing to say that the medical evidence was in any way inconsistent with the evidence testimony, which was rightly supported by the ocular testimony, which proved on the record, that the motive was rightly received. An affidavit of ocular testimony, even as the accused's wife appeared as defense witnesses, had fully supported the prosecution's case against the accused, rightly guilty of the murder conviction under the circumstances. It was found that the accused's conviction was properly recorded by the trial court, who accompanied him to the house of the gunman who was armed with a pistol. The colleague was shot dead on the part of his body that his death was inevitable, no less deserving of the death sentence, no reduction could be offered to him, except the accused's conviction was correct. Intact list of advocates from Kashmir lawyer