Find a Lawyer

ABDUR REHMAN versus GHAZAN

Section 17 (2) (4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (v. 1898), Sections 190 and 204 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7, 21D, 21 G&23 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 148 And 149 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XXX of 1965), Section 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Appeal Bail by Special Judge Special Trial Anti-Terrorist in Special Court to Trial Case Upon filing the petition, the court stated that, after hearing the arguments, it was concluded that the trial was not admissible by the special court, but that the session was in the jurisdiction of the special court of the judge. I came to the special court and observed that the applicant / complainant could get its remedy in the appropriate constituency. The applicant / complainant claimed in his constitutional petition that the Special Judge Anti-Terrorism Court did not have the power to decide in such a premature stage that the trial was not a competent trial against the accused by the Special Judge Anti-Terrorism Court. And it comes under special jurisdiction. Applicant / Complainant's Session Judge Pliya was of the view that it was only after confessing the crime and not before, that the Anti-Terrorist Court could hear the case after recording the authenticity of the case or seriously. There were no necessary conditions to be taken. When the court examines a case as it pays its mind to the facts of the case and the relevant law, it can happen at any stage because in its ordinary sense, identification means acquiring information about the facts. And be relevant. The Special Judge Anti-Terrorism Court has taken up the matter at this time property advocates from Kotla Pathan lawyer