SAHIBZADA MUHAMMAD ARSHAD versus BANK OF KHYBER THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR AND 4 OTHERS
RR 12 4, 12 5 & 12 6 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petitioner Applicant was dismissed after issuing notice demanding dismissal of employment, but the appointment of inquiry officer and his The applicant was charged with unlawful use of huge sums of money for personal gain when he was charged, according to the rules. According to the investigation, dismissal or dismissal is a major punishment if such charges are necessary. The service should be recommended then the justice demanded that the department should be inquired, the issuance of the showcase notice was not in compliance with the legal requirements, the conduct of the direct inquiry was not clear and for proper reasons the principle should be used with justice. Should. Yes, to be held and in exceptional cases it should be transmitted in writing by order so that the ND suspect was to be informed of such action and to give him a reasonable opportunity to show cause against the transfer of the regular investigation. What was to be done was because the allegation against the applicant was serious and he was charged with gross misappropriation, the authorized officer was investigated in accordance with R124 of the Bank of Khyber Employees Service Rules 1998 Or appoint an inquiry committee and the applicant should examine the witnesses and In this case, the defense should provide the opportunity to present were not such measures. Instructing the inquiry officer to appoint an inquiry officer or inquiry committee
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
