Find a Lawyer

HIDAYATULLAH versus STATE

Section 302 Testimony of Evidence The parties were affiliated with each other and there was no possibility of making false accusations. In fact, a large number of people were seen in the house of witnesses as prisoners. Was it natural to witness that the weapons of the crime were used by eyewitnesses? Was robbed and presented to police The incident was a bright day in a village within the four walls of a house where the deceased's close relatives were present in connection with the preparation of the wedding ceremony. Was found and then detained in a room that was promptly sought for any possible medical help. Emergency shifts in hospital for emergency, then injuries were shifted, but he died on his way to the hospital - the story of the incident was such that no suspicion or disorder was detected. Could walk It may have been necessary, but efforts to protect the lives of the injured were more emerging in nature as listed in the FIR, which was approximately 10/10/10 and the trauma and fear after the incident. The preparation for moving the injured in the event of a harassment, in the event of a lapse of time and a reasonable period of time between reports, was fully explained, by the persons present during or around the arrest process. There was no indication of his influence if he was arrested, in the FIR, site plan and medical evidence case against the accused. Any ambiguity or conflict was found, has proved more completely in most situations. Convincing and logical verdicts even in the entire prosecution's version and trial court criminal advocate from FR Bannu / Lakki lawyer