Find a Lawyer

MST. SHEHNAZ BIBI versus STATE

Sections 497, 499 and 439 of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII VI of 1979), Sections 10 (2), 11, 16 and 19 (2) guarantee, after the grant of bail bonds granted bail The $ 100,000 bond made with two guarantees, each with the condition that one of the female accused's guarantees should be related to that in a prohibited degree. It has been stated that the condition attached to the order of bail was challenged in the petition for review, which was unusual and was beyond the scope of the law and needed to be declared invalid. It was alleged that he had the right to guarantee his choice and could not be compelled to present a particular person under the law as his bail could be justified. That the date alleged by his spouse was completely serious and there was no crime and that the FIR against him could not be sustained because the alleged Nika's statement and her own statements were tossed in her own affidavit. He had also stated that in such case our marriage would be performed under Shariah Mohammadi, if the court had stipulated that at least one of the guarantees should be from a close relative of the accused, for any purpose. And with the trial court it was logical that one of the two bailiffs should be a close relative of the accused woman, was not illegal in any illegal action or even the victim of disorderly conduct. An order seeking non-submission was filed by the accused / applicant immigration advocates email from Hariwala lawyer