WALIYAT KHAN versus JM/CJ-V, ABBOTTABAD
Recording of the statement under Section 641 of the Crimes (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979 1979, VII of 1979), Article 10 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution Petition, Article 164 of the CCP Constitutional Application by the Judicial Magistrate The approved orders were moved to set aside. And then in the review by the Additional Sessions Judge, in which they rejected the applicants' request to record the statement under section 164, only one applicant's PC statement was tried because the second application The complainant was a complainant and his version was regularly listed in the relevant FIR. Applicants were of the view that there was no restriction in the relevant provision of the law to record the statement of a witness when the Deputy Attorney General did not oppose the applicant's request when the application was limited to the applicant only and not the complaint. The applicant's request to record his statement was valid as recording. The statement will promote the elimination of justice and assist in arriving at a valid conclusion by a court-approved petition, Section 164, CR. A directive was issued to record the applicant's statements under the PC
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Lower Dir lawyer