Section 302 (b) of the conviction on the evidence of conviction was attributed to the suspect in the chest injury, while all his accomplices were accused of shooting only the victim, but not the complainant and the prosecutor. Other witnesses appeared in court, each of the accused was declared to be the cause of the fire only, but also specified the part of the victim's body where the deceased suffered injuries from the hands of the participant. The embarrassing and dishonest improvement these men made in bringing their accounts to fruition. According to the medical evidence, since the prosecution testified for the improvement and dishonesty, the evidence included by the prosecution's witnesses was not credible, so the accused should be convinced The victim's brother was a brother. The witness, interested at the scene of the incident, was suspicious enough. After a long time, witnesses identified the body part late, which sustained a firearm injury and blamed each suspect for each injury. The mere fact that the prosecution's story through an unfaithful and relevant eyewitness account was enough to create suspicion in the ocular account cannot be believed that the motive was not attributed to the accused, but it was alleged by the co-accused. , Medical evidence, did not provide support to the account, nothing was recovered from the suspect during the investigation, There was no result and Akular could not verify the account, the prosecution failed to prove that his case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt, the accused was acquitted of the charge giving him the benefit of the doubt, and he was acquitted of the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
