Section 2 302 (b) appreciation of the Qatil-e-Amad evidence, the reduction of the focused statements of the eyewitnesses who remained steadfast during the death sentence could not be ruled out; their commitment to the deceased was clear, credible and affected their confidence. Who was There was no material contradiction Medical evidence confirmed the ocular version The presence of witnesses at the time of the incident was a natural defense Failure to prove its version through any evidence FIR immediately in the event of the day. Was named in which the firing took place. The accused proved guilty of the charge by eyewitnesses, and the prosecution stopped at the place where the accused, a 19/20-year-old boy, was ordered by his father. Committed the crime and the elder brother sentenced the offender, but his death sentence was imposed in Lee's crime under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
