Find a Lawyer

SAJID IQBAL versus STATE

Section 497 Drugs Act (XXXI of 1976), Sections 23 and 27 imports, manufacture and sale of drugs, false branded and unregistered drug bail, accused of grant violating Section 23 of the Drugs Act 1976 Was the one that was the least punished. The case of 5 years imprisonment did not come under the prohibition clause of Section 497, CR PC, as the minimum sentence of the offense had to be considered so as to restrict whether the offense was within the prohibited clause. , The accused had been in judicial lockup for ten months. And his invoice was not presented on the accused because of no previous history and no record. r \ n was inserted

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• Ch. IRSHAD ALI SAJID v. DIRECTOR-GENERAL, LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2013 PLD 133
• MUHAMMAD SHAUKAT v. GHULAM MUHAMMAD 2013 CLC 135
• MUHAMMAD MAJEED v. MUHAMMAD RAMZAN 2013 MLD 135
• MUHAMMAD YOUNIS v. NAZAR AHMED 2013 YLR 139
• Syed IMRAN ALI SHAH v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Human Resources (HR) Division, Islamabad 2013 PLC 143
• MUHAMMAD FAROOQ v. THE STATE 2013 MLD 145
• MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE v. MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE 2013 YLR 145
• MUHAMMAD YASEEN v. State 2013 PCrLJ 153

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

top advocates from Mian Walli lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes