Find a Lawyer

MULAZIM HUSSAIN versus INAYATULLAH

Sections 6, 13 and 24 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. VII, R 11 (c) The reduction of the suit court fee for pre-arrest was rejected by the plaintiff in his suit that the plaintiff received a court fee of Rs. The court is directed to file the case and issue a summons to the defendants, and the court also to the plaintiff. Directed to submit 1/5 of the value of the claimed land. In order to meet the court fee reduction, the net profit table was not prepared on time, along with the net profit table, a copy of the court fee and a copy of the nephew, by the plaintiff. Filed, the court allowed time for the trial. Submit the remaining amount The local commissioner properly set the fixed price of the suit land for the purpose of court fee and was instructed to pay some of the amount already paid by the claimant as a court fee payable. To meet the reduction in C. According to our fee due date, which was paid by the plaintiff, after the reduction of judicial fees, the trial court dismissed the trial court's decision, dismissing the trial court's decision under trial. Provided that the trial court did not have jurisdiction to extend or extend it. The trial court did not find the right amount of judicial fees on the first date to allow time to meet the reduction of judicial fees, which was brought before it, and finally the trial court granted judicial fees. Determine the exact amount family advocate from FR Peshawar lawyer