Find a Lawyer

S. SHAH RUKH, ASSISTANT VICE-PRESIDENT, NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN versus HAMAYUN AKHTAR ADIL, SENIOR EXECUTIVE VICE?-PRESIDENT NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN AND 3 OTHERS

Article 199 The application for constitutional application restriction order was upheld 8 months after the High Court's decision to grant the application for enforcement proceedings was challenged when the applicant challenged the cancellation order and retained the relief relief order. Unless the applicant's term of office has expired. A constitutional petition was filed with Constitution Prayer to keep himself restored. Such a request was heard by the former party and prayer was sought by the court. The respondent's order was challenged by the respondent, and the Supreme Court put aside the former party order and the petition filed by the High Court to restore the petition was heard. The High Court found that since the applicant had crossed the age of instability, he could not be reinstated. The respondent had paid the applicant all the financial benefits. The High Court had dismissed the petition in that direction. If the full financial benefits were not paid and the applicant felt dissatisfied that he could move to the appropriate forum and the conditions would not prevent his relief. online advocate from Gilgit lawyer