Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM ALIAS MANN versus STATE

Section 2302/4 364 / ?88 / ?99 of the testimony of the evidence was of two versions, one was presented by the prosecutor and the other by the accused and the version presented by one of the accused in the house of the accused. Which was a much more reprehensible and credible event. The incident occurred under serious and sudden provocation. Danda, who was used by domestic wives for grinding peppers, etc., had nine wounds on the deceased person, who said that under the heat, the accused had carried out the operation. The trial court's sentiment and its finding was that the trial court denied the last seen evidence and the incident of taking the deceased from his home was two days in filing an FIR, even though both sides were the same. Lived in the area, was charged, was punished under the circumstances. , But when in fact the confession took place under serious and sudden provocation, the sentence was changed from section 302 (b), PPC to section 302 (c), PPC and. His sentence was reduced from life imprisonment to ten years RI and the benefit of Section 382B, CR PC was also extended and the trial court's co-accused was sentenced, and he was set aside and He was acquitted of the case and released. power of attorney advocate Adda Jahan Khan lawyer