Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus MUHAMMAD ASIM, MAGISTRATE

His marriage to his original cousin was dealt with in the constitutional plea of Article 16 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Sections 161 and 164 of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Magistrate alleged abduction order and his The accused / defendant was allegedly abducted later and the marriage contract with the bridegroom's lady was signed at a later date when, after recovering, her statement was filed under Section 161, CR PC. Wind and was presented to the Area Magistrate for recording the statement under Section 164, CR PC Magistrate, without any requirement. The law, first recording the kidnapping statement in favor of the accused and then observing that the alleged kidnapping statement is not required to be recorded under section 164, the CRPC handed over the abductor's custody to the accused's act, Was illegal, unauthorized and liable because the magistrate acted beyond his jurisdiction before the magistrate was for record purposes only, Section 6464, the abductor statement under CCPC There was no case of presenting and detaining the abductors before, an impugned order passed by the Area Magistrate who intervened by the High Court. The demand was and was not retained in the law to allow the petition, set aside the order napayyd property advocates from Sherani lawyer