MST. BUSHRA PERVEEN versus SELECTION/RECRUITMENT COMMITTEE
Approval of Article 199 as an educator petitioner obtained 60 marks on the basis of the Union Council of Schools without 60 additional marks, while the respondent, on the basis of such 10 additional marks, obtained 57 marks. The selection committee interviewed the applicant , But 5 respondents were given interview marks and their appointment letter was charged with such authority that it was depriving the applicant of his or her valuable rights. The authority has chosen the procedure to be followed in accordance with the policy of the government in this matter. The constitutional jurisdiction could not be resolved No other post was available. No interruption to the appointment of the applicant can be made through the constitutional petition. The High Court dismissed the constitutional petition.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
