LIAQAT ALI versus IFTIKHAR AHMED
Sections 200, 202, 435 and 439 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), the dismissal of section 302 private complaint, the complainant filed a complaint against the applicant in the Special Judge's Anti-Terrorism Activities Court, stating that The petitioner has killed the brother of a special judicial magistrate. The inquiry said that the private complaint was submitted, after recording and examining the evidence, it was recommended that the complaint be dismissed, but the trial court did not agree to the inquiry report of the Judicial Magistrate, facing a case against the applicants. Issuance of a warrant to do so, such order of the trial court was suspended in the criminal review trial court. The Judicial Magistrate's report was not taken into account because it is not bound by the court as the applicants were being sought in a murder case which cost the trial, time and money, besides strictly. Applicants also have to consider the matter. Even temporarily reviewing the evidence and examining the evidence, the Magistrate's eligibility report cannot be taken lightly, stating that it is not binding that the trial court's affidavit was set aside and the trial After the hearing parties were returned to the trial court to pass a new speaking order.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Larkana lawyer