Find a Lawyer

SAJID BASHIR versus CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY THROUGH CHAIRMAN

Section 4 (1) (b) was challenged by the General Manager, Legal and Counter of Directors General to maintain the Adjournment Remarks appeal, by the Appellant to maintain the appeal of the Remarks recorded in the ACR. That the negative comments are based on the reporting officer's intent as challenged by the appellant. The appellant also alleged that the person's legal appointment as a director through a constitutional petition had alleged that the countersigning officer had not acted on his independent judicial mind, while responding to the said remarks, the authorities resisted it. That it is not sustained under section 4 (b). In the Service Tribunals Act, 1973, the legitimate objection of the Authority was misunderstood because the appeal was not against the order and decision to determine the fitness of a department or to promote the appellant, but not a reporting officer. Was against the negative comment contained in the ACR by and countersigned by. Counseling officer appealed against negative comments to service tribunal It did not show that he was behaving normally, against which the appellant filed a constitutional report, with the reporting officer lodging strong comments against him. The petition challenging the appointment of the appellant on his post report was, in the circumstances, recorded by a person who, in his report by the countersigning officer, disagreed with the IO. law firms from Kohlu lawyer