SYED SHAH SAWAR versus KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION LIMITED
Clause 14 (b) (d) of the Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), appeals to the appellants to issue show cause notices and after service of inquiry on allegations of fraud, dishonesty, corruption and gross misconduct. Removed from job Etc. The accused were not found guilty in the first inquiry and the inquiry officer denied the allegations in their report. Despite the close of the inquiry matter, the appellant was again prosecuted under the department which was a clear act of rape and The reason for this was that the first inquiry was a regular inquiry, there was no justification for conducting the second inquiry which would have otherwise been done by the inquiry officer based on the information made in the second inquiry based solely on speculations and omissions. In which any evidence was found while recording the desired results Was not dependent nor a copy was provided. The inquiry report was neither issued a final show cause notice nor was he given a personal hearing. Removal of service from appellants, which was an essential requirement of the law, was not justified, in the circumstances a provisional injunction was made and the authorities were instructed to appeal to the appellants with all previous benefits. Restore.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Jaranwala lawyer