Find a Lawyer

AURANGZAIB TAJ versus MANAGING DIRECTOR, SINDH ENGINEERING (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI

Section 2A, 4 and 6 Retirement / Service Appeal Limit Appellants, who were initially appointed as assistants in the organization, were promoted as mechanics, then their services were terminated by retrenchment, He filed a complaint against the order of his return which was dismissed by the Labor Court through the Appellant through the Labor Appeal Tribunal Appellant filed the same before the Constitutional High Court. During the approval of the Constitution, the Service Tribunals Act, 1973 was amended and Section 2A was inserted. Under Article 212 of the Constitution Petition, the Act, which falls under the jurisdiction of state-controlled / owned corporations and sovereign entities, was upheld by the High Court on November 23, 1998 and referred to the appellant. was done. The service tribunal by which the present appeal was filed on 28 11 1998 when the reason for filing the present appeal arose on 10 6 1997 when the service tribunals act was amended in 1973 and inserted section 2A. A 90-day period was provided for filing an appeal before Section 6 of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973. In all pending cases before the different courts, the service tribunal, after amending the Service Tribunals Act 1973, rejected the constitutional application filed by the appellant, the High Court was automatic and needed to approve any order in the pending proceedings. Was not even when the order was approved. Appeal not filed by the Appellant before the Service Tribunal, immediately after the date of the High Court famous lower court advocate from Theing Jattan More lawyer