Find a Lawyer

ANWAR ALI BALOCH versus REGISTRAR, MEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, JAMSHORO

3, 4, 5, 7 and 8 after issuing show cause notices to 29 reverse appeal appellants serving as Assistant Professors in the Sindh Service Tribunal Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 Fundamental Rights, B18. Returned to 17, the charge sheet he and the student complained of and conducted an inquiry against him alleging that the appellant sought unlawful pleasure from him as an examiner. But on refusal to pay him, he said he was declared illegally satisfactory which made him fail the exam. The matter was investigated in full by the independent and impartial judicial officer of the case on the departmental basis. The evidence has been confirmed by the evidence. During the course of the inquiry, the appellant was given a fair chance / opportunity of defense which proceeded. The day they attended and they examined the witnesses and they were not discriminated against, all were formally and legally executed in connection with the formal inquiry proceedings. Provided the perfect opportunity to appear. Its defense has not yet found any legal weakness as far as disciplinary procedures were concerned the department had already adopted a very soft view and the applicant was not convicted of any lower stage change without specifying the duration of the sentence. The lower penalty was imposed, however it appears to have been violated. Fundamental Rule 29 While upholding the order of rebellion against the appellant, the penalty was upheld by the same ban for a period of four years without total effect. patent advocate from Jauharabad lawyer