Find a Lawyer

SYED SAHIB SHAH versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS

Section 9A Sindh Service Tribunal Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 Police Rules, 1934, R 13 1 Tribunal Appellate Authorization for Development Appellant was initially appointed Assistant Sub Inspector Police, Development was found and He was posted as the Police Official Sub Inspector. This was later confirmed, resulting in 50 rounds, including one of Kalashnikov's assaults and one of Kalashnikov's injuries, due to the appellant's brilliant performance in a contest or a brave act. , The appellant was temporarily transferred to the post of Inspector. After one year, the appellant and others were referred to as their sub-inspector appellants but were promoted to seniority-based inspector positions. Subsequently, the Authority claimed that the return of the appellant and the others was withdrawn after the decision passed by the service tribunal. Maintained by the Supreme Court and consequently / was a violation of the High Speed Police Rules, 1934 V The Ultimate Authority misinterpreted it as relied upon to say that the decision was taken out of The question about certification was under consideration and it was believed that turn-by-turn verification was not valid under the Rules Promotion, and authentication was entirely two different things. Referring to R 13 1 of Police Rules 1934, satisfying different conditions, in the present case it has been observed that he has progressed from one level to another in the police force or from one level to another. And, of course, any of the history of the performance of the Act ask a advocate free from Lakimarwat lawyer