Find a Lawyer

MOHIB K. HABIB versus THE PROVINCE OF SINDH

Rr 3, 4 (1) (b) (iii), 5 and 10 A Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 Services Appellant Reduction in retention of files, removal of files and other forms with the Appellant Was detected. The Inquiry Officer, presented in a proper form and with a showcase notice for corruption, declared the appellant guilty of the allegations leveled against him and the competent officer recommended a two-year reduction in time scales, but the governor Emphasized the Sindh R10A. In the Public Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1973, the appellant was better punished for dismissing employees from employment, of which two appellants who were accused of similar wrongdoing also applied for the same. Appellant was entitled to the same treatment under the principles of consistency. In the presence of the appellant and the appellant, the inquiry was not allowed on the occasion of cross examination which left little justification for the restoration of the conviction award, if any, in view of the facts and circumstances of the case. The appeal and stability of the sentence will be inimical to justice and court orders, and the order of dismissal from the service passed against the appellant was unsealed and reinstated. family advocate from Besham lawyer