RAFAQAT ALI versus MUHAMMAD BASHIR KHAN
Article 104, O VIII, R1 and O XLII, R1 (b) Written statement, defense defendant not to be charged with strike; Subject to O VIII, the validity of R1, CPC was passed by the trial court for filing a written statement but the defendant did not file the same case in which only the defense proceedings were dismissed and The verdict was not pronounced, so, under O XLIII, R 1 b), the CPC was not authorized in any trial court-approved order of any kind Had failed to sandhy, neither he nor any legal authority and jurisdiction and on appeal that the trial court had rightly granted as was deleted in ranges
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Chowk Azam lawyer
