Find a Lawyer

SH. MUHAMMAD SHAFI versus SH. ALA-UD-DIN

Evidence of a thirty-year-old document titled Section 42 of the Martyrdom (Article of the 1984 of the Ten), Arts & 76 and Civil Code of Civil Code (v. 1908), Section 115, on the original document of thirty years old document The fact that the execution was denied was denied by the following courts that the plaintiff claimed ownership of this suit property on the basis of a registered sale deed executed in favor of his predecessor. Defendants opposed the case on the basis that the suit property was transferred to the owner by his owner. Of his deferred Dover's money and his wife moved the property in their favor, defendants relied on a copy of the alleged execution agreement dated 30 6 1960 in support of their claim, the lawsuit said. The trial court ruled in favor of the defendants because the defendants failed to prove their execution. The agreement in favor of the wife by the owner judge and the order passed by the trial court, which was upheld by the appellate court, was that the agreement was a recognized document, which led to the legality of the agreement being only thirty years old. Was made solely by relying on Article 100 of law and evidence. Concerning 1984, it cannot be specifically proved that when it was disclosed by the Executive Documents under Article 76 of the Convention, 1984, the secondary evidence concerning its existence was substantiated by the Defendants' original documents. Terms and contents were not proven. Present it to the author, the marginal witness or the persons familiar with the written documents / signatures. best law firm from Domeli lawyer