Find a Lawyer

SHAHID ALI versus STATE

According to the Section 497 (2) Immigration Ordinance (XVIII's 19.79), Section 17/22 bail, further investigation grant FIR: The defendant stated that he had raised the possibility of sending three persons abroad for the purpose of employment. In fact, three persons had gone abroad and then returned to Pakistan after some time had nothing to independently prove that they had been sent abroad or that they had been told The deportation was done and the prosecution had mentioned seven other persons in the confession and three persons did not say that the FIR should be sent abroad by the accused. Even on the preliminary note relied on by the prosecution, it was not said that the three persons indicated along with the FIR agreement were related to any other allegations against the accused, but the FIR In the present case, the number of affidavits has been sent to the accused in which different persons have maintained that the three persons had in fact gone abroad had no connection with the help of any other person and the accused. Nothing was recovered from the suspect's possession during the arrest, now for physical purposes for the purpose of investigation. It was not necessary because it was finalized only after the investigation, the case against the accused was further summoned under section 497, (2) Investigation of his crime, CCP accused on bail. Submitted, under conditions lawer from fb area from FR Kohat lawyer