Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAZZAQ versus STATE

The dispute in connection with the bail hearing plot before the arrest of Section 498 Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), Rule 420/452/468/471/448/467 was all decided and it cannot be settled yet. A fake or genuine report from the local commission revealed that the accused's brother had been occupying the plot for the past 7/8 years. It is alleged that the accused forcibly seized the plot after the sale agreement was forfeited. Considering this and his case was open for further investigation by the complainant, the accused had joined the police inquiry into the commission's inquiry in view of the accused's alleged question. Will not come Its path since it was neither equipped with any specific weapon at the relevant time, nor was any weapon used in the alleged incident, nor was the interim arrest warrant already allowed in the circumstances nfirmed advocate for immigration from Haripur lawyer