Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 489F Financial Institutions (Rehabilitation of Financial Resources) Ordinance (XLVI of 2001), Sections 7 and 20 Release of arrest warrant for dishonest check advertising, charges against the accused The confirmation was that when he obtained the housekeeping finance facility from the complainant bank, 14 checks were issued to discharge his liability, when the checks were disregarded for submission while the complaining bank. While financing the houses from the accused, the complainant also approved the mortgage in favor of the complainant bank under-tax. If he fails to discharge his obligation, he may be satisfied with the prediction or by selling the mortgaged property bank, at the time of execution of the same seat, the defendant may take 14 checks from the borrower for the issuance of the obligation. Was. The checks did not indicate the accused's dishonest intentions when his Rupertti was in mortgage with the bank and it was required, according to the provisions of section 489F, PPC, that the checks be issued with dishonest intent. In the present case, such dishonest intention was not clear at the time of signing of a person's check to take advantage of the financing and even otherwise the bank has the financial institutions (recovery of financing). ) There was sufficient security in the form of a mortgage agreement to repay the loan taken through the Ordinance 2001, and the procedure for The car was delivered. Section 77 of the Ordinance covered the civil and criminal proceedings of the default party in litigation under section 2020 of the Ordinance Police, which dealt with financing
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
