Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ZAHID versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN

Section Pre Pre-Impression Suit Claimant asserts that because of the affidavit, it is preferable to pre-emptively claim that there exists a net existence between the land of the suit and the land owned by the plaintiff because the evidence is binding. That he can, without any doubt, prove that his former right is the right of authorship. The outlaw plan developed by Warabandi and the plaintiff shows that both such lands are being irrigated with the same outlet. Such water storage and its water belong to the government. Can't Claim Defendant's Claim Can't Claim Defendant's Rights on the Official Water Core

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• MUHAMMAD LATIF v. State 2013 YLR 1257
• UMER DRAZ v. State 2013 MLD 1257
• NAVEED AKHTAR KAHUT v. RETURNING OFFICER (NA-60), CHAKWAL 2013 CLC 1258
• SAEED AHMAD MUGHAL v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1261
• ITTEFAQ RICE MILLS v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2013 PTD 1274
• MUHAMMAD JAVED v. MANAGING DIRECTOR SUI NORTHERN GAS 2013 CLC 1276
• MUHAMMAD ANWAAR v. ADMINISTRATOR CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT 2013 MLD 1277
• SHAHID HUSSAIN v. State 2013 YLR 1281

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

top civil advocates from Lalshanra lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes