Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NAVEED AKHTAR KAHUT versus RETURNING OFFICER (NA-60), CHAKWAL


Section 14 (5) and (5A) Representation of the People (Holding of Elections) Rules, 1977, R5 (1) Prior to the Appeal Locks Standing, the Returning Officer Appellant did not file objections against the Returning Officer's candidate. At the time of the papers nomination scrutiny there was no concrete evidence to prove that the appellant had filed an objection to the nomination of the respondents, only one candidate against the approval of the nomination papers, the Representation of Representation Act, Section 14 (5). ). This right of the competing candidate was given to an electoral constituency, who filed objections under R5 (1) of the Public Representation (Election Code) Rule 1977, the appellant did not file objections before the Returning Officer and There was no candidate so he lacked the Lux Standi. Appeal dismissed in circumstances for filing an appeal

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocates from Kashmore lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.