Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD JAVED versus MANAGING DIRECTOR SUI NORTHERN GAS

O XVII, R 3 The plaintiff will be in favor of the prosecutor under the evidence that the trial is dismissed by the trial court, despite the costs of the evidence being prepared by the plaintiff and the numerous opportunities with specific warnings. Neither can the Beto Party be allowed to hide and consult the court to prolong the case and waste time on the plaintiff because of such conduct the plaintiff seemed less interested in pursuing his case. The trial court did not show any reason for the absence of evidence on the relevant hearing date. Later the case was rightly dismissed. The plaintiff's evidence was rejected by the High Court

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• NAVEED AKHTAR KAHUT v. RETURNING OFFICER (NA-60), CHAKWAL 2013 CLC 1258
• SAEED AHMAD MUGHAL v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1261
• MUHAMMAD ZAHID v. MUHAMMAD RAMZAN 2013 MLD 1263
• ITTEFAQ RICE MILLS v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2013 PTD 1274
• MUHAMMAD ANWAAR v. ADMINISTRATOR CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT 2013 MLD 1277
• SHAHID HUSSAIN v. State 2013 YLR 1281
• MINISTRY OF DEFENCE v. MUHAMMAD ATHAR 2013 MLD 1284
• Mst. HAMEEDA BIBI v. ATAA MUHAMMAD 2013 YLR 1289

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

best advocate from Eminabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes